The following is a guest post from Georgi Koreli, CEO & Co-Founder of Hinkal.

For years, crypto wallets have been like open books, broadcasting every single transaction, balance, and interaction for anyone to see on a public ledger. While this radical transparency was initially hailed as a core strength of blockchain, many now see it as a significant vulnerability. Think about it: according to State Street Global Advisors, 62% of institutional investors actually prefer to get into crypto indirectly or through regulated channels. Why? Because they’re wary of having their every move laid bare on a public ledger. In a space that aims to compete with traditional finance (TradFi), this inability to keep business confidential is a real Achilles’ heel.

Consider the recent $1.5 billion Bybit hack. It was reportedly triggered by a wallet compromise – a stark reminder of the dangers of this hyper-transparency. When everything is public, hackers can easily pinpoint high-value accounts, track their activity, and launch laser-focused attacks. Experts like Vitalik Buterin and EY’s Paul Brody have both stressed that for crypto to truly take off, we need to bake in privacy, not just rely on open ledgers. Despite these loud and clear warnings, the crypto world largely sticks with a model that leaves its users – from small-time investors to major players – unnecessarily exposed.

Fatal Flaws of Public Wallets

Let’s dig deeper into why public wallets are problematic. First off: constant surveillance. Every single token swap, NFT purchase, or simple balance move is stamped on the blockchain for all to see. With enough digging, anyone can piece together a wallet’s holdings and get a surprisingly detailed picture of spending habits, investment strategies, and even who they interact with. While this is unsettling for individual users, it’s a complete non-starter for institutions that need to guard sensitive business information – no thanks!

What’s worse, security risks skyrocket when everyone knows what every wallet holds. Hackers can easily spot the big pots of crypto and then launch sophisticated phishing scams or social engineering attacks to try and drain them. The Bybit incident is a chilling example of what happens when bad actors lock onto a high-profile address. Once the stolen funds are funneled through mixers or other methods, getting them back becomes virtually impossible. For institutions managing large sums or making strategic trades, this level of visibility isn’t just a risk; it’s a built-in flaw that opens them up to front-running and extortion.

Finally, regulatory and competitive headaches arise from the assumption that total openness equals compliance. Traditional regulations lean on controlled gateways, risk assessments, and audited reports – not just a perpetual public broadcast like blockchains offer. Businesses need to keep things under wraps when negotiating deals or sharing financial details with partners. If every transaction is instantly visible to competitors, it wipes out any strategic advantage. Bottom line: public wallets aren’t just inconvenient; they actively undermine the practical business case for crypto in the real world.

Private Blockchains: A Mirage of Safety?

Some companies have tried to side-step these transparency issues by turning to private blockchains. These limit access to a select group, keeping transaction details away from the prying eyes of the public. However, this approach clashes with the very essence of decentralization. A small group in charge can change the rules, block transactions, or control the system in ways that go against the core idea of trustless crypto.

Beyond that, private blockchains often stifle liquidity and the cool thing called composability. One of DeFi’s superpowers is how different platforms plug and play together – often compared to “money Legos.” Breaking off into isolated private networks destroys this ecosystem effect. Plus, external developers lose the motivation to build on top of a controlled sandbox they can’t freely access.

Despite the initial appeal, private chains risk hindering collaboration and stifling the very innovation that fueled the growth of public networks. The right answer has to be finding a balance between privacy and the open-source spirit that defines public blockchains.

Privacy Wallets with ZK

The real path to bringing crypto into the mainstream is through privacy wallets that harness clever cryptography, like zk-SNARKs and stealth addresses. Zk-SNARKs (or Zero-Knowledge Succinct Non-Interactive Arguments of Knowledge – quite a mouthful!) essentially let you prove something is true (like a valid transaction) without revealing any of the specific details. Instead of broadcasting every single token movement, the blockchain just gets confirmation that the transaction is legit.

Meanwhile, stealth addresses help keep senders and receivers anonymous by creating temporary, one-time-use addresses for every transaction. This way, you maintain the liquidity and interconnectedness of public blockchains while still safeguarding private data. Selective disclosure then allows users to share detailed transaction histories with regulators or auditors when needed, without plastering it all over the public ledger. This approach cleverly bridges the gap between the need for compliance and the fundamental right to privacy.

With these features in play, institutions can make big token trades without tipping off front-runners. Companies can manage expenses and payroll without broadcasting sensitive financial data. And everyday users get the same level of discretion they’re used to with traditional banking. All while, the network stays decentralized, open, and buzzing with activity.

Balancing Privacy, Compliance, and Security

Some critics wrongly equate privacy with lawlessness, but that’s a false comparison. Regular banks don’t publish everyone’s account details for the world to see, yet they still adhere to KYC, AML, and other regulations. In a privacy wallet system, authorized bodies – with the proper legal justification – could be granted decryption keys if needed, reducing the risk of unchecked illegal activity. The result? A system where user privacy and regulatory compliance can actually work hand-in-hand.

It’s also crucial to understand that privacy features aren’t a replacement for solid cybersecurity. The Bybit hack highlighted the ongoing need for multi-signature wallets, hardware key storage, and all the standard best practices for protecting digital assets. Privacy wallets simply dial down the incentive for hackers by hiding which addresses are loaded with funds – an extra layer of security that adds to, not replaces, other safeguards.

Public Wallets Are Done – A Call for a Confidential Future

In conclusion, public wallets are becoming outdated. Serious businesses demand confidentiality, and everyday users are turned off by complete transparency. It’s no surprise that thought leaders like Vitalik Buterin and Paul Brody have been urging the industry to prioritize privacy – mass adoption simply won’t happen if every transaction is up for grabs by data miners, hackers, and shady competitors.

The core point is this: the entire crypto industry must adapt if it wants to truly challenge TradFi. Transparency on everything is a thing of the past – it hinders business adoption, jeopardizes personal security, and scares off institutional investment.

Privacy wallets offer a smart middle ground. They keep the core benefits of public blockchains – open access, network effects, smooth compatibility – while fixing their biggest drawback: the lack of confidentiality. Introducing stealth addresses, zk-SNARKs, and selective disclosure paves the way for crypto to be truly useful for everyone. It reduces the appeal for hackers, eases institutional concerns, and puts users back in control.

So, the takeaway is clear: public wallets are no longer fit for purpose in a maturing crypto world. Making the shift to privacy-focused wallets is the move that will make digital assets genuinely viable in the wider financial landscape. If we’re serious about competing with established financial systems, privacy isn’t optional – it’s the missing piece, and we can’t afford to ignore it.

Mentioned in this article